On Thursday, the Caltrain board is considering a second fare increase, just one year after the last increase. The proposal includes an increase to individual fares and parking prices, and a substantial increase to deep-discount corporate GoPass prices (see below and this staff report for details).  But Caltrain hasn’t released any information from their fare study, which is not coming out until later in the year.  Â
Last year, the Caltrain board set a direction to raise fares incrementally, and to increase fares every two years. The board also directed staff to conduct a comprehensive fare study, looking at issues including equity, the relationship between fares and ridership, and the structure of the GoPass bulk-discount program, which gives much better prices for full-time employees of major corporations than to service workers in Caltrain downtowns and job centers.
At the time of the last fare increase a year ago, there was significant rider pushback against setting a fare increase that was not based on data, and that did not consider issues of equity and the GoPass structure. Â In the last year, Caltrain has seen modest ridership decreases, and some have hypothesized that the fare increase may have contributed to lower ridership.
The rationale to do a second, early fare increase before the release of the study is that VTA is having budget issues which will result in decreased contribution, and Caltrain will need to draw on reserves to balance its budget.
What do you think about Caltrain’s proposal to raise prices a year early, without data from the fare study and discussion on the substantive issues the board wanted discussed. The decision to increase GoPass prices is probably reasonable, but what is the rationale for the pricing level?  Shouldn’t transportation management associations be able to provide GoPass fares to groups of restaurants and retailers? If you’re concerned, send a note to board@caltrain.com, and send us a copy at friends@friendsofcaltrain.com
Or come if you can to the board meeting, 10am on Thursday, 1250 San Carlos Ave in San Carlos near the train station.
- Increasing Go-Pass fares by 50 percent
- Pricing monthly passes at the equivalent of 15 days per month, rather than 13 per days per month
- Eliminating the discounted 8-Ride ticket
- Pricing monthly parking fees at the equivalent of 15 days/month, rather than 10 days per month
- Increasing the Zone fare by $0.25
- Implementing a pilot program to provide discounts for weekend and evening riders





How about kids travel for free on week-ends?
Caltrain should implement station to station pricing.
@ Evans: Caltrain should implement station to station pricing.
I and others have suggested this several times. I have even produced station to station fare matrix. It would make the minimum fare and short trips lower and the whole fare system much more equitable.
@Jeff Carter should be much more feasible now. Clipper readers can either show “Yes” for cash fares or they show the station range for passes. TVMs can be like the LIRR where you select the two stations. I usually buy my LIRR tickets using the app and activate as the train pulls into the station. I have my usual stations as a favorite so it is fast.
This proposal by Caltrain places a significant burden on the regular everyday riders. With the per-zone increase and changing the monthly multiplier from 26.5 to 30 times the one-way Clipper fare, the increase in monthly tickets is over 20%. Why Caltrain is using the terminology of based on XX days or equivalent to XX days instead of just using a multiplier seems rather unusual. Is Caltrain trying to trash the monthly pass? A growing number of customers use Caltrain 4 days/week and this proposal makes the monthly pass less attractive to them, especially with the elimination of the 8-ride ticket. Based on the just released fall 2016 Triennial Survey, the average Caltrain customer rides Caltrain 4.38 days/week, which is about 19 days/month or 38 trips/month. Some may remember the last time Caltrain raised fares and at the Board meeting of 5-November-2015, the fare comparison table staff presented used the eligible discount pricing for the monthly pass compared to regular price monthly on other rail systems. The board was very concerned at the ‘very low†price of the monthly pass. It wasn’t until pointed out that the table was wrong that staff realized the mistake, minutes of the meeting can be found here: http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/__Agendas+and+Minutes/JPB/Board+of+Directors/Minutes/2015/2015-11-05+JPB+BOD+Minutes.pdf
Caltrain has a very high farebox recover near 70%, second only to BART here in the bay area (although there are questions as to how BART calculates farebox recovery). Caltrains farebox recovery is higher than nearly all of the other commuter rail systems they call their “peers “ see page 9, slide 18 here: http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/__Agendas+and+Minutes/JPB/Board+of+Directors/Presentations/2017/2017-05-04+Preliminary+FY2018+Operating+Budget.pdf
It was also noted that the JPB partner member agencies (MUNI, SAMTRANS, VTA) contributions have significantly decreased since 2005 see slide 17 on page 9.
Farebox recovery on VTA is around 11-12%, SamTrans is around 18-19%, and MUNI is around 33%, is this fair? Why should Caltrain be forced to pay more? Yes, Caltrain does not have a dedicated source of funding but why doesn’t the bay area transit manifesto do something about it, they have been talking about this problem for over 25 years. Of course they have no problem throwing money at dubious BART extensions. So Caltrain suffers, fares will be going up, yet trains remain crowded, as there are no planned increases in capacity in the near long term future.
Below is a table of the current fares vs. the proposed fares, I don’t know how to post this so it shows up in nice columns…
COMPARISON OF CURRENT CALTRAIN FARES AND PROPOSED FARES
1 ZONE CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE % CHANGE
ONE-WAY TVM $3.75 $3.75 $0.00 0.0%
ONE WAY CLIPPER $3.20 $3.20 $0.00 0.0%
DAY PASS TVM $7.50 $7.50 $0.00 0.0%
MONTHLY $84.80 $96.00 $11.20 13.2%
2 ZONES CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE % CHANGE
ONE-WAY TVM $5.75 $6.00 $0.25 4.3%
ONE WAY CLIPPER $5.20 $5.45 $0.25 4.8%
DAY PASS TVM $11.50 $12.00 $0.50 4.3%
MONTHLY $137.80 $163.50 $25.70 18.7%
3 ZONES CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE % CHANGE
ONE-WAY TVM $7.75 $8.25 $0.50 6.5%
ONE WAY CLIPPER $7.20 $7.70 $0.50 6.9%
DAY PASS TVM $15.50 $16.50 $1.00 6.5%
MONTHLY $190.80 $231.00 $40.20 21.1%
4 ZONES CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE % CHANGE
ONE-WAY TVM $9.75 $10.50 $0.75 7.7%
ONE WAY CLIPPER $9.20 $9.95 $0.75 8.2%
DAY PASS TVM $19.50 $21.00 $1.50 7.7%
MONTHLY $243.80 $298.50 $54.70 22.4%
5 ZONES CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE % CHANGE
ONE-WAY TVM $11.75 $12.75 $1.00 8.5%
ONE WAY CLIPPER $11.20 $12.20 $1.00 8.9%
DAY PASS TVM $23.50 $25.50 $2.00 8.5%
MONTHLY $296.80 $366.00 $69.20 23.3%
6 ZONES CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE % CHANGE
ONE-WAY TVM $13.75 $15.00 $1.25 9.1%
ONE WAY CLIPPER $13.20 $14.45 $1.25 9.5%
DAY PASS TVM $27.50 $30.00 $2.50 9.1%
MONTHLY $349.80 $433.50 $83.70 23.9%
[…] cuts to capital funding, and operating funding leading to a premature fare increase, were triggered in this budget cycle, by the VTA’s inability to pay its share of its […]
[…] surprise premature proposed fare increase – put together in a hurry to fill an operating budget gap, rather than crafted based on […]
[…] cuts to capital funding, and operating funding leading to a premature fare increase, were triggered in this budget cycle, by the VTA’s inability to pay its share of its Caltrain […]
This is a horrible idea. The increases are absolutely outrageous. I will never ride Caltrain again if they pass this & I know that many of my fellow riders who I have spoken to share my same feelings. We can’t afford it and there are cheaper options out there.