At tomorrow’s San Francisco Board of Supervisors meeting, the board will consider a fast-moving process to decide on a spending package for a November transportation ballot measure.
The expenditure plan could include investments in BART, Muni, Caltrain, as well as bicycle and pedestrian safety, build on earlier work by the Mayor’s 2030 transportation task force in 2013, which outlined transportation needs and priorities. The measure would run for 25 years, raising about $100M annually; about $2.5 billion in current dollars.
The action being proposed for tomorrow is a process with 3 public meetings in May and June to discuss priorities for the ballot measure.
For Caltrain supporters, an important question is whether San Francisco would use this measure to match Santa Clara County’s planned contribution of $300Million for improvements that would increase capacity, reliability and speed (longer platforms, longer trains, level boarding) after basic electrification. Extra capacity provided by electric service is expected to quickly be filled with ridership growth. The corresponding cost in San Francisco would also be about $300 million, according to Caltrain. Other Caltrain investments San Francisco could choose include grade separations and committing San Francisco’s share of system reliability investments.
We don’t yet have information about other potential investments for the measure for Muni, BART, and active transportation.





Longer platforms and longer trains are not necessary. We need train frequency!
@Evans. Correct: 8-car EMUs are 640-feet long and the standard Caltrain platform is 700-feet long, so the only platforms that need lengthening are the Diridon and Transbay platforms (1,350 feet).
The Capitol and Blossom Hill stations also need “Tamien-like” service (and more than one platform) to support the massive developments adjacent to each station.
Roland, I suggest coupling two 4-car EMU for peak period and one 4-car EMU for local, midday and weekend. EMU should have automatic coupling/decoupling equipment like BART or VTA light rail.
@Evans. Your intention is good but, unfortunately, each EMU cab car only has about 1/2 of the capacity of a passenger car, so two coupled 4-car EMUs would end up with the capacity of a 7-car EMU (that’s why SamTrans abandoned the cute little “twins” and “triplets”).
The cab cars would also have to be designed to allow through access during emergencies in tunnels (like BART) and this results in structural integrity issues in the case of a frontal impact.
Very disappointing! It is clear that electrified Caltrain still have poor midday/night/weekend frequency like every 30~60 min, because of high operating cost.
Not all train consist need to be split. In case to operate SF-Redwood city local train every 15 minutes, only 7~8 set of 4-car consist is needed. Rest of them can be full consist. SF-SJ express will have enough ridership to runs every 15 min with full consist, 7-days a week.
The decision about post-electrification frequency hasn’t been made yet.