Caltrain touts the prospect of substantially higher ridership, and the potential for more frequent service – in its application for Cap and Trade funding to fully electrify service between San Francisco and San Jose Tamien station.
With all-electric, more frequent service and 8-car trains, Caltrain estimates that ridership could more than double from about 60,000 per weekday today to over 140,000 by 2040.
The sketched service pattern that could more-than-double ridership includes 8 trains per direction per hour at peak, trains at non-express stations every 15 minutes at peak (but 30 minutes mid-day), and a connection to downtown San Francisco with most trains serving the new Transbay station (details in appendices and attachments). Whether to run a more frequent service pattern – and the goals and span of that service – will be up to the Caltrain Board, in decisions it will make in the context of the ongoing Business Plan (and feedback from riders and community members).
The grant application includes funding for a full set of 8-car electric trains, and for lengthening platforms to hold 8-car trains. But the application only includes funding to study adjusting platforms for level boarding, which could provide half again as much speed benefit as electrification, while greatly improving accessibility for people with wheelchairs, strollers, luggage and bikes.
Interestingly, the grant application includes $3.5 million for secure bicycle storage at Caltrain stations. Caltrain describes the need for bike parking as important to capacity – the agency wants to continue to serve people using bicycles, while enabling space on the trains to serve more passengers.
Also interestingly, the grant application notes a consequence of fully electrifying service between San Francisco and San Jose Tamien could be redeployment of diesel trains to increase service from San Jose to Gilroy – and on down to Salinas. But the grant does not request funding to run the additional service; it is unclear how far the Measure B funding that VTA raised in 2016 would go to beef up service from Tamien to Gilroy.
Some questions raised by the cap and trade application:
* The timeline outlined in application indicates that Caltrain would start electric service immediately with longer trains, and move to all-electric service up to 5 years later. Would it be possible to start all-electric service sooner?
* Is it a good idea to modify Caltrain platforms twice, or is there any chance of getting funding and moving to level boarding sooner?
* Will the train sets allow Caltrain to run 8-car trains at peak period, and split them up into 4-car trains for more frequent service off-peak
The Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program received applications for much more funding than the amount available, so we will see how much funding Caltrain may get from the state toward longer trains and full electrification. 





I feel like we’re missing some big piece of work or dependency on why level boarding keeps getting pushed back.
We know that we need all EMU fleet replacing all diesel service in order to begin work on high platforms. Anything else?
Madness not to put level platforms first.
Platform height decision for blended system with HSR. It’s faster/cheaper to adjust platforms to the 20x” height than the 50x” height, which would need more work for ADA access and station design.
The high set of Caltrain EMU doors was meant for level boarding AND to match the predicted door height of future CA HSR trainsets to be used in “blended” operation to allow not only shared track, electrification and signaling/PTC infrastructure, but also station platform sharing between SJ and SF.
So level boarding at the high-level EMU doors can only occur “sooner” when Caltrain has a sufficiently large & reliable EMU fleet such that it can safely end use of all existing/legacy Bombardier and gallery cars on the SF-SJ core system. Because it will be impossible for riders to board or alight any of the existing car fleet with their low doors at ~50-inch “level boarding” platforms.
Gilroy/Salinas riders will have to transfer to/from EMU trains in SJ, where there will have to be some low-level “legacy car height” platforms for ACE, Capitols, Amtrak Coast Starlights and Caltrain Gilroy trains.
Who needs high platforms???
https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/paris-ile-de-france/paris/tgv-ouigo-vont-partir-gare-montparnasse-decembre-1337699.html
[…] 2021, BART connections planned for the mid-2020s, and more growth happening in between. Â Even with longer platforms and longer trains, Caltrain seems likely to run out of room at 6 trains per […]