At Thursday’s board meeting, the Caltrain board is scheduled to approve the Request for Proposals for electric trains, which is a major step moving electrification forward.  One of the big debates is how much space to provide for bikes on the trains. But with any of the proposals about how much space to add bikes on the train, Caltrain is not yet planning to seek full funding for the increased need to support bicycles offboard.
At the last Caltrain board meeting, Caltrain proposed budgeting $3 Million to increase offboard bicycle facilities, which is a substantial improvement over past minimal investment. Â The goal is to meet the needs of 20% of Caltrain passengers who will be using bikes with electrified Caltrain.
In any of the scenarios for accommodating bicycle users onboard electric Caltrain – Caltrain’s proposal to keep the share the same as today, and also the San Francisco and Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalitions’ proposal to increase the share onboard – a larger share of bike users will need to use offboard facilities (storage, bikeshare) instead of bringing bikes onboard.
- If Caltrain pursues the staff recommendation of a ratio of 9:1 seats to bikes, and wants to be able to accommodate a goal of 20% of passengers using bicycles with Caltrain, then  ~ $9 Million will be needed.
- If the Bicycle Coalition ask to accommodate a higher share of bikes, with a 6:1 ratio of seats to bikes, then a lower share of bicycle users will need to be accommodated – at a cost more like $7 million.
If you support the Bicycle Coalitions’ proposals for more bikes on the train – there will still be a need for more investment in offboard facilities to support growth in bike use with Caltrain.Â
Currently, Caltrain is in negotiations with High Speed Rail to invest $600 Million or more in increases to Caltrain capacity. Investments in offboard bike facilities enable Caltrain to carry more passengers while maximizing space on board. Â A contribution from HSR would account for less than 1% of that proposed budget. Â There are other available funding sources, including regional, state, city, and employers.
Given our area’s land use, bicycles are a critical component of the transit system, providing essential first and last mile connections that enable more people to use transit and stay off the clogged freeways.
Cost estimates, offboard facilities with 20% bike usage | ||||||||||
Percent secure storage (lockers, cages) vs. racks | 0.85 | |||||||||
Individual offboard users | Lastmile Bikeshare, SF and SJ only | Bikeshare users | Bike storage users | Lockers/cages | Basic racks | Cost of lockers & cages | Cost of basic racks | Cost, offboard facilities | ||
Offboard bike trips, with 9:1 seat/bike ratio | 10,782 | 5391 | 0.16 | 1,725 | 3,666 | 3116 | 550 | 9,348,244 | 68,737 | 9,416,981 |
Offboard bike use, 6:1 ratio | 8,191 | 4095 | 0.16 | 1,311 | 2,785 | 2367 | 418 | 7,101,479 | 52,217 | 7,153,696 |
Caltrain plans to underfund needed offboard bike facilities http://t.co/PIsjjHPhG8 http://t.co/hGDcubKTkE
$15M will be available for off-board bicycle storage as soon as the Board exercise clause 6.B in the 1996 JPB Agreement: http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/Public/JPA_Agreement_and_Amendment_10-03-1996.pdf (top of Page 8).
This was communicated to the Board when they approved the FY16 Operating budget at the last Board meeting: http://tinyurl.com/ope33px
and should put an end to any further confusion between “Caltrain” and “SamTrans”.
@Roland, again, your info is outdated. SFMTA and SCVTA already repaid Samtrans fund Samtrans advanded on ROW purchase in 2011, as the overall package they reached with MTC to not drastically cut service due to Samtran’s budget crisis.
@William What budget crisis?
Did you read/understand last month’s letter to the Board of Directors, namely that the Caltrain farebox has reached such historic levels that there is no longer any need for partner contributions or are you saying that Caltrain is supposed to be subsidizing SamTrans?
Caltrain 2011 Fiscal Crisis:
http://www.caltrain.com/about/fiscalcrisis/fiscalcrisisFAQ.html
Caltrain 2011 Fiscal Crisis MTC Deal:
http://sf.streetsblog.org/2011/03/11/caltrain-service-cuts-could-be-mitigated-with-new-mtc-plan/
@William, again, your info is outdated: farebox revenues back in 2011 were $43M (approximately half of what they are now): http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/_Finance/BUDGETS/JPB/PCJPB+2011+Adopted+Budget.pdf.
The only reason Caltrain continues to need an operating subsidy from the 3 partners is that SamTrans Administration costs (which were already out of control back in 2011) have DOUBLED in the last 4 years.
@Roland, I didn’t say Caltrain don’t need members contribution, just that the fund Samtrans advanced for ROW purchased had been repaid. Whether you felt Samtrans’ fee is justified is another question.
[…] Despite On-Board Capacity Crunch, Caltrain May Leave Off-Board Bike Parking Underfunded (GC) […]
Published today: Caltrain EMU RFP staff report (agenda item 9) calls for 10% bike spaces
1. Staff will obtain option prices for vehicles with two different door designs:
a) A vehicle with two sets of doors, in which the higher doors would be sealed and seats would be placed adjacent to those doors until such time as the needs of and plans for the High Speed Rail/Blended System are further defined and future evaluation of the interior of the EMUs, as it relates to the deployment of the previously sealed doors, is warranted; and
b) A vehicle with a single set of low-level doors.
In the event that the vehicle with two sets of doors proves to be more expensive, a contract award based upon this option will depend on the ability and willingness of the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) to pay for the additional costs required to procure the double door vehicles.
2. EMUs will be designed to enhance the safety and comfort of standing passengers.
3. EMUs will maintain an onboard ratio of nine seats for every one bike space. To complement onboard bike storage, there will be a parallel effort to modernize wayside bike facilities to be accomplished through significant investment including funding, staff time and station space, to establish modern bike facilities and amenities.
4. One Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) bathroom will be provided for each six car EMU train. During the vehicle design phase options for replacing ADA bathrooms with seats and/or standee space may be considered if warranted.
With the 10% bike spaces recommendation for the EMU RFP, it appears Caltrain staff set to give bikes-on-Caltrain riders the middle finger.
I can’t be sure, but I’ve for years suspected that certain key staffers and/or board members really, really don’t like bicyclists.
Every single bikes-on-board improvement (going all the way back to before racks were installed with a 2-bike-per-train held-in-the-aisle-of-the-cab-car limit) has only come after Caltrain was reluctantly browbeat / berated into doing so.
And every single one has proved wildly successful as measured by increased demand/usage …
[…] to Adina Levin of Friends of Caltrain, however, an estimated $9 million would be needed to provide enough bike parking for 20 percent of […]