Wednesday March 27: Palo Alto community considers citywide tunnel for Caltrain tracks

On Wednesday, March 27 from 6pm to 8pm, the City of Palo Alto is hosting a community meeting that will review a popular but challenging option to separate the Caltrain tracks from city streets.   The community meeting will inform a Council decision process that has been lengthened until October to incorporate feedback of a stakeholder group to consider funding strategies.

Challenges with tunnel and trench designs

While residents had hoped that a tunnel would be the least intrusive option for the community,  technical analysis presented to the Community Advisory Panel at its March meeting showed that space needed to create tunnel entrances for the trains would require the full taking of 22 properties, including homes (see image). 

pa-tunnel-property-takes

Earlier grade separation options for the Churchill crossing that would have required property takings had been taken off the table after very strong community objections to any option that would require the taking of homes. At last Monday’s city council meeting, community members whose homes would be taken by the tunnel design similarly pleaded with City Council to eliminate this option.

Earlier descriptions of this community meeting indicated that the agenda would also consider the South Alto Trench option which would move the train tracks to a trench running beneath Meadow and Charleston streets from the tracks.

The latest analysis of the South Palo Alto trench option showed significant drainage challenges, as the proposed trench would cut through Matadero and Adobe Creeks. Pumping stations would need to be installed that would need to continuously pump all the water whenever the creeks are running. Caltrain has indicated that because a trench design is not needed for transportation and safety purposes, they would not pay for the operating costs of continuous pumping, leaving the cost of continuous pumping for the city’s budget.

The need for continuous pumping of shallow groundwater at a location near the Bay was one of the reasons that the City of Burlingame had earlier decided not to move forward with a trench design for their Broadway grade separation, although that had earlier been a preference of the Council and community.

Financial challenges

The citywide tunnel also faces financial challenges.  An earlier report had indicated that the cost of the design would be in the range of $3Billion to $4Billion, while a South Palo Alto trench would cost in the range of $750Million to $1Billion.

How might the options be paid for?  At the last Community Advisory Panel, the community members were presented a set of funding options that focused on a variety of forms of business taxes, but did not include the property tax and land value capture options that had also been described in the earlier report.   While the CAP presentation showed the business tax options, it did not show the amount of money that might be raised by the tax options, and how the attainable funds compared to the cost of the proposed project, unlike the earlier report, which did sketch out how much different tax options might raise.

At last Monday’s City Council meeting, business leaders including Chamber of Commerce head Judy Kleinberg, expressed concerns that the business community had not yet been consulted, and wanted any further discussion of business taxes to be held off until a stakeholder group including businesses had a chance to discuss options.   Council agreed that a stakeholder group should be convened, and decided to extend the decision til October to leave time for the stakeholder process and funding discussions.

A funding discussion including business taxes should surely include the business community. When Mountain View passed its recent Measure P business tax to fund local transportation and housing needs, the city developed the tax options with substantial consultation with the business community.  Key groups, including the Silicon Valley Leadership Group and the Mountain View Chamber of Commerce expressed concerns and did not support the tax – but they also did not campaign against it.  A tax measure is much more difficult to pass if there is a strong, funded opposing campaign.

However, we hope that the valid desire for a stakeholder group to discuss funding options in detail doesn’t prevent the costs and funding options from being presented at Wednesday’s community meeting.  And a variety of funding mechanisms, as analyzed earlier, should be presented.  Community members need to have the chance to look at the price tags of the trench and tunnel options, to start to assess whether the community has an appetite for these sorts of significant expenditures.  Then the stakeholder group can dive into the details.

The upcoming meeting on Wednesday will be an important one where community members will have a chance to react to the options – and significant challenges – of the citywide tunnel and perhaps the trench options.  The meeting will also cover the Churchill Ave crossing and traffic data.  So please come if you are concerned about Palo Alto’s grade separation choices.

The meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 27, 6pm-8pm, at the Mitchell Park Community Center El Palo Alto Room, at  3700 Middlefield Rd in Palo Alto.