Resolving the Caltrain budget crisis
Today, the JPB, which is facing a $12.5 million budget deficit, declared fiscal emergency. Caltrain can now plan service reductions and fare increases without having to complete environmental review.
See San Francisco Streetsblog’s coverage of the meeting today
Caltrain is currently considering a fare increase (25 cent on base fare and/or 25 cent on each fare zone). As for service reduction, there’s not much to cut since most Caltrain trips are quite productive. Weekend service, for instance, brings in occasional riders who buy one way tickets and day passes.
The Gilroy service, however, is considered the prime candidate for service elimination. Ridership on the Gilroy segment has declined steadily over the years after the freeway widening on 101 and the introduction of express buses. Cutting that segment can also generate higher savings by consolidating crew bases from three to two. However, cutting the Gilroy service would save less than $1 million.
With the use of an additional one time federal funding approved by MTC, it is possible to prevent the worst case scenario for the next 12 months, but next year Caltrain is expecting a larger deficit with the loss of a one time fund along with an additional cut in subsidy from SamTrans.
Looking a year ahead, Caltrain and SamTrans need to pursue these strategies now to prevent major service cuts:
First, SamTrans needs to get tough on its unions. Unlike many agencies who have successfully froze their wages or are in the process of doing so, SamTrans will increase its wages and benefits according to labor contracts. These contracts will expire next year. SamTrans should aggressively negotiate an agreement that reflects the current economic condition.
Caltrain also needs to aggressively pursue downsizing train crews, especially during off-peak hours. This year, Caltrain is putting its train operation to bid.
City/County Association of Government (C/CAG) in San Mateo County is currently conducting polls to see whether county voters support an increase in the vehicle license fee. The state has given the power to local congestion management agencies to raise VLF with simple majority voter approval. That funding can be used for transportation purposes (including transit). A plan to increase the VLF can go to voters as soon as this November. Other counties can also follow suit.
The Green Caltrain blog is sponsored by BayRail Alliance, an all-volunteer non-profit organization supporting green rail transit in the Bay Area. This blog and BayRail have no affiliation with Caltrain.


[...] More on Yesterday's Caltrain Board Meeting from Green Caltrain [...]
“downsizing train crews” — what are the rules regarding this? Already, there’s a single engineer and only 2 conductors on each train. How do you downsize from this?
The second conductor can be eliminated, which is mostly there for customer service and fare enforcement. A single conductor should be sufficient for safety/regulatory functions.
[...] Caltrain is already a lean operation — there really is very little fat to cut. Green Caltrain has a couple of ideas on saving money, especially from SamTrans (and have you seen SamTrans fleet of shiny brand new buses? [...]
Do not down size the crew ,they are there for the safety of passengers and the train. Disband the JPB ,get rid of the high salaries of Gigi and michelle ,John Cockle Doty ,Dunn etc.
Have Amtrak run the operation ,with construction payroll ,Amtrak is self sufficient they can do it all , they will report to the state period .
Where can I find more detailed budget information than what’s published at http://www.caltrain.com/Budget.html ? In particular, I’m interested in the detailed breakdowns for lines “Contract Operating & Maintenance” and “Rail Operator Service”.
You can check the agenda packet that are posted online, which includes descriptions. Otherwise you need to contact Caltrain.
http://caltrain.com/pdf/BOD_Agenda_Reports/060310_JPB_Agenda_Packet.pdf